I look for how they look. I see a lot of beautiful women on here but women with tits so big you cant see their face is a big turn off to me. Most think they look good with huge tits, but even when I look on here if they are to big for my taste I pass right over them. and I rate women who show a great boy but not their face even lower. it is a hame that a woman with a great body is ashamed to show her face. but everybody has a like and dislike and will rate different. What looks good to me might not to someone else. People have an inner beauty that will show in photos also.
No, I notice the same thing. I think people just have a very diverse sense of taste.
Notice that if you actually try to find a girl that's rated below four on this site randomly, it might take you a while. Try to find one rated under 3 and you could be here quite a while.
Likewise, try to find one rated above an 8 overall, or even a seven might take you quite a few clicks.
It's a sign of how diverse individual tastes truly are.
Interesting question.
I'd be rather more inclined to vote in the manner you (888SPO) describe if this was a "dating" site. Its not.
I rate the photos according to how "hot" the women are as depicted, not as potential fantasy dates.
Like Spanky1 I'm not impressed by huge tits and I like to see the faces.
My scale is something like this:
10 - Stunningly beautiful. Could go for years without ever seeing someone this good looking in person in real life.
9 - Gorgeous. Like the most beautiful women you might actually see in person, rarely but every so often.
8 - Beautiful. A girl like this would always turn your head and maybe elicit an exclamation (even if silently because you are with your girlfriend)
7 - Pretty. Way better than most females you might encounter.
6 - Nice looking. Better than the average woman you see.
5 - Average. About the same as the typical girl you see in the mall.
4 - Half Decent. Below average, but you would not be put off if you saw a woman like this for real.
3 - Ugly. No redeeming physical qualities, and you might look the other way if you saw her in person.
2 - Nasty. Offensive or off-putting in some way that would make you walk the other way if in her presence.
1 - Repulsive. Gross, disgusting and totally without redeeming quality to the point you might get sick if you saw her in person.
In addition to these base ratings, I add or subtract points for things I do like or don't like, such as body type, tattoos, piercings, make up, outfits, smoking, poses, etc. (No, I won't say which is which.) Sometimes I upgrade a score when there is something charming or alluring that just appeals to me, or downgrade when I get a bad vibe.
[Deleted] 14 years ago
I have given up trying to figure how people vote. I truly think there are a few who think the scale is backwards. IE a 1 = Best and 10 = Worst. Or there are a few that are just tools.
Typically, for me, a gal has to be topless at a minimum to get a 7. That is a good looking topless gal, not some sea-hag. Fully clothed really doesn't score above a 6 with me unless she has an outstanding feature (eyes, smile, cleavage, etc).
In all the time I have been here I have maybe scored 10 - 12 or so gals a 10. 15 or so I have scored a 9 and maybe 30 I have given an 8 to.
I have also noticed my tastes in women seem to be pretty different from the majority on here.
Well I'd like that all the pictures would show the face, because there could be a nice body 10 - 9 but a partial body can only have partial rate 7 - 8, because naked or not, I think that looks does matter.
And it can variate also pretty much depending what people likes.... Some like blonds, some ebony, some readheadeds, etc, and there is when the hight and low rates come
For me its overall quality: Face (very important), Body ( tits and hips), hands and feet, and then picture quality - In some of the pics you can see its a really hot bird but the picture quality really sucks and that will get a low score from me. Very important for me is the fact that it must be/seem amateur. Pro girls are usually a bit too hot (take that with a pinch of salt) and the setting is always just too perfect. i would vote higher for amateur submitted stuff than pro anyday!
(beer)
A lot of things go in to play when rating these girls. It really depends on what they're wearing, if anything, eyes, position (huge), quality of the picture. If I don't feel I can rate above a 5, I choose not to vote. Frankly, it just seems like a waste.
Quality of the girl and quality of the pic. A lot of things annoy me in pics and I might mark it 1 or 2 points lower. Smoking, stupid faces, certain guys in the pic take away from it, and sometimes red eye really ruins it as well. There's also times where I rate a pic a 6 and come back to awhile later and wonder why I rated it so low or vice versa. I gave it an 8 or 9 and thought it really should have been a 6 or 7. So my tastes do change from time to time.
For me it's either a 10 or nothing.
The most important part of the picture is the quality. Of course she has to be insanely attractive but if it's a crappy camera phone shot, I don't like it.
When it comes to the average pic, I go for a lot of things with the girl, her face is as important as her body, the photo quality and the surroundings may be an issue as well. Then I have this thing for bondage pics, they always get a very high score from me - unless they are really crappy, one way or the other.
like animals- it's about smell, and focus !
